Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness
Scholar Gateway
Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!
Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper AbstractsGirard (p. 9-22)
Cooper (p. 23-32)Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)Stasio (p. 47-56)Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106) 
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
Team Process Measurement: A Comparison of Criterion-Related Validity of Teamwork Appraisal Tools
Author(s): Sayeedul Islam, Jennifer Nieman-Gonder, David Cassel
Citation: Sayeedul Islam, Jennifer Nieman-Gonder, David Cassel, (2021) "Team Process Measurement: A Comparison of Criterion-Related Validity of Teamwork Appraisal Tools," American Journal of Management, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp. 32-48
Article Type: Research paper
Publisher: North American Business Press
Abstract:
As organizations compete in an increasingly VUCA environment, performance appraisal processes become more important to their success. This is especially true as teams are implemented in organizations as a tool to make complex decisions. Little work has been done to assess the effectiveness of performance appraisal tools in predicting objective team performance. In the present study, 57 students organized into 19 3-person teams to work on a task. Results indicate that team process measurements were strongly correlated with one another but were not very predictive of objective team performance. Teams that viewed themselves as “real” teams were correlated with task performance. Future research should evaluate other team process measures for their criterion-related validity.
