Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness
Scholar Gateway
Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!
Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper AbstractsGirard (p. 9-22)
Cooper (p. 23-32)Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)Stasio (p. 47-56)Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106) 
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PRACTICE
Rose’s Turn:
How Women in Positions of Political Leadership Handle Terrorism on the Homefront
Author(s): Hannah Engber
Citation: Hannah Engber, (2020) "Rose’s Turn: How Women in Positions of Political Leadership Handle Terrorism on the Homefront," Journal of Management Policy and Practice, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, pp. 102-109
Article Type: Research paper
Publisher: North American Business Press
Abstract:
From Elizabeth II to Hillary Clinton, women in political leadership roles have been judged far more mercilessly for their decisions, especially those requiring force. Over the decades, some argue that their female bodies are too emotional to handle issues like terrorism appropriately. Others argue that it is because of their maternal instincts and protectiveness make them entirely unfit to handle tough decisions. By looking at figures like Margaret Thatcher and Golda Meir and through analysis of their counterterrorism policies in their nations, one can begin to distinguish the difference, if any, between women and men as public leaders.
