Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness
Scholar Gateway
Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper AbstractsGirard (p. 9-22)Cooper (p. 23-32)Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)Stasio (p. 47-56)Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106) 
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Ex-Post Rationalisation in Business Decision Making: Objective Performance and Subjective Satisfaction
Author(s): Josef Neuert, Manuel Woschank
Citation: Josef Neuert, Manuel Woschank, (2017) "Ex-Post Rationalisation in Business Decision Making: Objective Performance and Subjective Satisfaction," Journal of Organizational Psychology, Vol. 17, Iss. 4 , pp. 102-111
Article Type: Research paper
Publisher: North American Business Press
Abstract:
Business decision making theory and practice mostly focus on either normative prescriptions and/or descriptive analyses of decision making behaviour, decision making situations and contexts, decision making criteria, and decision making heuristics. Much lesser frequently, emphasis is placed on the problem, whether the actual outcomes and results of decision making processes, measured by "objective" indicators are in line with the subjective satisfaction of the decision makers with their efforts, commitment and performance. Various empirical findings, however, suggest that "objective performance" and "subjective satisfaction" with the procedures and the outcomes of decision making are not at all positively related. A field study and a laboratory experiment, hereto, show mixed findings, as reported in this paper.
