Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness
Scholar Gateway
Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper AbstractsGirard (p. 9-22)Cooper (p. 23-32)Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)Stasio (p. 47-56)Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106) 
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Cognitive Ability and Objective and Subjective Task Complexity:
Unique and Differential Effects on Performance,
Self-Efficacy, and Cognitive Appraisals
Author(s): Debra Steele-Johnson, Julie Steinke, Zach Kalinoski
Citation: Debra Steele-Johnson, Julie Steinke, Zach Kalinoski, (2011) "Cognitive Ability and Objective and Subjective Task Complexity: Unique and Differential Effects on Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Cognitive Appraisals" Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 73 - 86
Article Type: Research paper
Publisher: North American Business Press
Abstract:
We proposed a multi-level model examining the differential effects of ability and task complexity (objective and subjective) on performance, self-efficacy, and the cognitive appraisals of threat and challenge. For individuals (N = 183) performing a class scheduling task simulation, results indicated that cognitive ability and objective and subjective task complexity accounted for unique variance in performance and self-efficacy and that subjective task complexity accounted for unique variance in cognitive appraisals. Results highlight the importance of distinguishing between objective and subjective task complexity and examining effects on factors related to emotion such as cognitive appraisals.
